Determining style choices according to accessibility needs
Image:Various colours in inventory
Guided by our core principles, we began developing the design system by creating the UI kit. One challenge we faced was selecting styles that complemented Chobani's vibrant and distinctive graphic design branding. A major concern was the potential impact on the brand identity in its online ecosystem if we altered any key style elements.
Image:Finalised colours in UI kit
To resolve this, we shifted our focus to a more practical perspective, prioritising accessibility within the digital product environment. We evaluated all colours and fonts on the current Chobani website against WCAG standards. Colours and fonts that failed to meet accessibility criteria were eliminated.
Making Trade-offs Based on Component Usage Frequency
Image: multiple button styles in inventory
Another critical challenge is the complicated decisions about which complicated decisions due to the existing inconsistencies and lack of standardisation, which I was mainly responsible for its solution. Despite the redundancy of some UI elements, they effectively embody Chobani’s strong brand identity and align with the company’s values.
Image: multiple button styles in inventory
My role at this stage involved overseeing the progress, creating checklists, and rebuilding foundational elements such as icons, logos, and components including checkboxes, navigation bars, etc.
To tackle the issue of redundancy, we refined the checklist by analysing the components' usage frequency before beginning the design process. Lacking access to internal usage data, I adopted the stoplight chart method to assess usage frequency using four key metrics: component utilisation rate, frequency of access, reuse ratio, and key function (considered from a designer’s perspective).